ArchiLabs Integration
Carry design intent into commissioning — and field truth back to the model with the Bluerithm + ArchiLabs integration
Every commissioning provider knows the feeling. The design team spent months building a coordinated model with equipment schedules, performance data, and sequences of operation. Then construction starts, and all of that structured information gets flattened into PDFs, retyped into spreadsheets, and rebuilt from scratch in the commissioning platform. By the time the building is turned over, the field data collected during startup and testing lives in one system, the design intent lives in another, and the owner inherits a handoff package that was assembled by hand from both.
The integration between Bluerithm and ArchiLabs is aimed squarely at that gap.
Two platforms, two halves of the project
ArchiLabs is a design-automation platform built around a browser-based BIM and design workspace. It generates layouts, routes critical pathways, extracts equipment parameters from manufacturer spec sheets, drafts RFI responses from project context, and produces sheets, schedules, and structured handoff data. It goes deepest on data centers, with strong support for MEP, fire protection, and modular workflows.
Bluerithm is a commissioning management platform. It’s where equipment gets tracked through installation, startup, prefunctional checklists, functional performance tests, integrated systems tests, and closeout. It’s where issues are logged and resolved, where field data is captured on tablets and phones, and where reports are generated for owners and authorities having jurisdiction.
Put simply: ArchiLabs is strongest before the equipment arrives on site. Bluerithm is strongest after. The value of connecting them is that the project doesn’t have to start over at the boundary.
Design data flowing into construction
The first and most obvious direction is design to construction. When a project moves from ArchiLabs into Bluerithm, the commissioning team should be able to start easily from the design, not from a blank project.
Equipment lists and tags
The equipment ArchiLabs placed in the model — AHUs, CRAHs, chillers, pumps, UPS modules, PDUs, generators, VAV boxes — becomes the equipment register in Bluerithm, with the same tags, the same system assignments, and the same areas served. No re-keying, and no mismatch between what the drawings say and what the commissioning platform tracks.
Design properties
ArchiLabs turns disparate design data into structured parameters: airflow, static pressure, capacity, voltage, kW, dimensions. Bluerithm already stores equipment properties with separate design and field-verified values. Syncing the design values in means every checklist and test form is pre-populated with what the equipment is supposed to do, so the technician in the field is comparing against design intent instead of hunting through submittals.
Sequences and design basis
Functional test procedures are written against sequences of operation. When the design basis, redundancy requirements, and control sequences are structured data in ArchiLabs rather than prose buried in a PDF, they can seed the data Bluerithm’s AI can use to interpret into tests procedures and workflow sequencing in Bluerithm.
Change propagation
Designs change during construction. When a rack row moves or an AHU gets resized in ArchiLabs, the affected equipment and properties can update in Bluerithm rather than drifting out of sync until someone notices at startup.
Field data flowing back to design
The less obvious direction, and arguably the more valuable one over the life of a facility, is construction back to design.
Installed equipment data
The actual manufacturer, model, and serial number of what was installed. The nameplate data. The field-measured values from startup and TAB. Bluerithm captures all of this as part of normal commissioning and QA work, and it belongs in the model and the handoff package, not in a separate binder.
Test results and verification status
Whether each piece of equipment passed its prefunctional checklist and functional test, when, and with what readings. For a data center, that’s the difference between a model that says “2N” and a model that says “2N, verified under load on this date.”
Issues and deficiencies
Commissioning issues often point back to design. A clearance problem found during a walkthrough, a sequence that doesn’t behave as written, a piece of equipment that can’t hit its design airflow — these are exactly the things ArchiLabs’s validation and RFI workflows are meant to reason about. Feeding field-discovered issues back gives the design tools real-world signal, and gives the design team a traceable record of what was found and how it was resolved.
Operations-ready handoff
ArchiLabs already targets DCIM, EPMS, and BMS handoff. Bluerithm already integrates with digital twin platforms like Willow. When both sides are working from the same equipment data, the handoff to operations reflects the facility as commissioned, not as drawn.
Why this matters most for data centers and mission-critical facilities
Commissioning a data center is a multi-level process — from factory witness testing through component, system, and integrated systems testing under load. The equipment count is enormous, the redundancy requirements are unforgiving, and the documentation burden is heavy. This is exactly the environment where re-entering data by hand introduces the most risk and costs the most time.
ArchiLabs is building for that market from the design side. Bluerithm has supported industrial and mission-critical commissioning firms for years from the construction side. Connecting the two means a data center project can carry structured equipment and system data from the first layout through Level 5 testing and into operations without a manual rebuild at any stage.
How it works under the hood
Both platforms were built to be connected. ArchiLabs exposes APIs and an embeddable SDK. Bluerithm offers a full read/write REST API and an MCP server, which means the integration can be driven by conventional API sync or by AI agents that orchestrate work across both systems — reading the design, setting up the commissioning project, and pushing field results back.
The details of what syncs, how often, and in which direction will depend on the project and the teams involved. The point is that neither platform is a closed box, and the integration doesn’t require anyone to abandon the tools they already use.
What's next
We’re working with ArchiLabs on what this integration looks like in practice. If you’re a commissioning provider, design firm, or owner working on data center or mission-critical projects and you want to be involved early, get in touch. We’d like to build this around real projects.
Related Integrations
Connect the tools and data you use on your projects
Bluerithm MCP Server
Use Bluerithm's Model Context Protocol (MCP) server to set up commissioning projects inside Bluerithm with AI agents.
View integrationBluerithm API
Programmatically access data from your Bluerithm account and projects.
View integrationProcore Integration
Create embedded dashboards and integrate data to synchronize Procore Observations and Bluerithm Issues.
View integration